Search "user:mkubecek"

Can you be more specific? I updated a study earlier today and I cannot see any difference.

I'm afraid using cloud evalulation values where available would bring more inconsistencies. Even now there are some spurious "blunders" e.g. because the analysis cannot see a forced checkmate after on…

@Sharingam said in #24: > why are you so eager to defend the cheater... @Sharingam said in #33: > I don't see why the abuse of my comment, I haven't accused anyone You haven't? When you called a speci…

I cannot imagine how problems with connectivity could cause this. A problem with the mouse seems most likely reason, IMHO. Can you try a different mouse?

Your "all" is almost 6 years so that the granularity of the values shown in graph is approximately two weeks. Thus last being 5 days ago isn't so unexpected. After all, when you display a time interva…

@pierogiman said in #3: > So I have a hard time blaming anyone for playing it out. I get annoyed, rather, when someone refuses to let you play mate-in-1 or -2, especially a beautiful one. You're not s…

> Staff sends here bullshit telling trolls Nobody sent me... I was just tempted to check how well do your claims match reality and when I did, I commented on what I saw. > I go to play in fairer sites…

The way the algorithm is designed, the average result between players with 300 points difference in (stable) rating should be 0.84, i.e. if you take a random sample of 100 games with this rating diffe…

@Sicilian67 said in #4: > normally I lose 6 point only when losing with opponents having at least 100 rating points less than me Are you sure? In your latest game against Kakashi_lightening, you lost …

@Sendrien said in #13: > I agree that the Panov reaches an open position out of the opening, but is it really that sharp? There's not much tension in the position, and the major imbalance is the IQP. …