Hi,
if you want to keep communication authentic, you cant be too sensitive. I understand it is a fine balance, but yday i accused somebody of cheating, not insulting with "bad words" but more objective. My track record btw is now only 99%, but there are so many cheaters out there.
We played a short bullet match after and i apologised to him admitting my wrong conclusion.
He was friendly as well but likely reported me before we got friendly... fair enough...
Whenever i get accused it is basically a huge compliment for a great game and if i dont like a chat, i turn it off or block the member. Whats the big deal?
One thing that makes Lichess so great is the open source and "free for everybody" philosphy. Reason why i happily am a lifetime patron.
This doesnt give me any extra rights, which is a good thing and in line with the above.
I wonder how high the % of "insults" really is and how much moderation work is there. A bit of banter is what can give it spice.
There are sore losers, Carlsen is one of the biggest. You can disagree about "style", but there is a line of emotion that should be allowed, perhaps even welcomed .
I am simply worried that if i got a "warning" for this, what else is considered "offensive".
if you want to keep communication authentic, you cant be too sensitive. I understand it is a fine balance, but yday i accused somebody of cheating, not insulting with "bad words" but more objective. My track record btw is now only 99%, but there are so many cheaters out there.
We played a short bullet match after and i apologised to him admitting my wrong conclusion.
He was friendly as well but likely reported me before we got friendly... fair enough...
Whenever i get accused it is basically a huge compliment for a great game and if i dont like a chat, i turn it off or block the member. Whats the big deal?
One thing that makes Lichess so great is the open source and "free for everybody" philosphy. Reason why i happily am a lifetime patron.
This doesnt give me any extra rights, which is a good thing and in line with the above.
I wonder how high the % of "insults" really is and how much moderation work is there. A bit of banter is what can give it spice.
There are sore losers, Carlsen is one of the biggest. You can disagree about "style", but there is a line of emotion that should be allowed, perhaps even welcomed .
I am simply worried that if i got a "warning" for this, what else is considered "offensive".